Cooper: Recycled tires and religious liberty

Cooper: Recycled tires and religious liberty

July 8th, 2017 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

The empty playground at Trinity Lutheran Church in Columbia, Mo., awaits its recycled tires surface.

Photo by Annaliese Nurnberg

James G. Blaine never saw a recycled tire, much less an automobile, but it was his failed constitutional amendment nearly a century and a half ago that led to the recent United States Supreme Court ruling that will allow a Lutheran Church preschool and day care center in Columbia, Mo., to have a playground surface of recycled tires.

In time, the high court ruling may have more implications than a playground in the Show-Me State — or it may not.

But here's how we got there:

Blaine, then a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Maine, was trying to support then-President Ulysses S. Grant, who had called for free public schools but no government support for "sectarian schools" run by religious organizations or schools with "sectarian, pagan or atheistical dogmas."

His 1875 Constitutional amendment read in part: "[N]o money raised by taxation in any State for the support of public schools, or derived from any public fund therefor, nor any public lands devoted thereto, shall ever be under the control of any religious sect; nor shall any money so raised or lands so devoted be divided between religious sects or denominations."

Fueled by the country's anti-Catholic immigrant fervor, the amendment sailed through the House by a vote of 180-7. However, it failed by four votes of the necessary two-thirds vote in the Senate and never became law.

Blaine, who already had been the speaker of the House, went on to be a U.S. senator, secretary of state under two presidents and was the 1884 Republican nominee for president, losing to Grover Cleveland by fewer than 58,000 votes out of nearly 10 million cast, one of the closest results in history.

Individual states, though, took up his no-tax-money-for-private-schools cause. In time, all but 10 states — Tennessee was one of the 10 — passed various laws that became known as "Blaine amendments" that banned the use of public funds to support sectarian private schools.

That led to the recent denial by Missouri, which had enacted one of the "Blaine amendments," of Trinity Lutheran Church's competitive application for the recycled tires playground surface, which comes from a program administered by the state's Department of Natural Resources.

Not surprisingly, state courts — and eventually federal courts — upheld the state's denial. But the Supreme Court said otherwise, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing that the state cannot exclude a church from a public benefit merely because it is a religious institution and that to do so "is odious to our Constitution."

On the surface, the 7-2 ruling is significant because it seems to portend a broader decision about school choice and about whether parents have the right to expect their tax dollars — in the likes of vouchers or tax credits — to follow their children into religious or sectarian schools.

However, where the case gets interesting is a footnote in his ruling to which Roberts called attention. The footnote states, "The case involves express discrimination based on religious identity with respect to playground resurfacing. We do not address religious uses of funding or other forms or discrimination."

Court watchers have scratched their heads about this addendum. On the one hand, as with many cases in the Roberts court, it may mean the decision had fewer broader implications. Others said the footnote was added to gain the votes of liberal Elena Kagan and moderate Anthony Kennedy.

On the other hand, the court sent back to Colorado and New Mexico — for reconsideration based on the Trinity Lutheran decision — cases on tuition scholarships and textbook lending, respectively, that were appealed from the two state supreme courts. And Justice Neil Gorsuch, in a separate concurring opinion, noted "that some might mistakenly read it to suggest that only 'playground resurfacing' cases, or only those with some association with children's safety or health are governed by the legal rules recounted in and faithfully applied by the Court's opinion . Such a reading would be unreasonable for our cases are 'governed by general principles rather than ad hoc improvisations' and the general principles here do not permit discrimination against religious exercise — whether on the playground or anywhere else."

Given the latter, we believe it will be difficult for the court to make future decisions that force churches to choose between participation in public-run programs and maintaining their religious character. And, yes, that could involve school choice decisions. Indeed, when public schools no longer serve the needs of many students and when so many alternatives are available, that's a discussion the country needs to have.

Whatever happens in the future, the recent Supreme Court decision was a ruling for religious liberty, a liberty Blaine apparently couldn't fathom.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com


Loading...