Cooper's Eye on the Left: New York Times still trying to blame Sarah Palin

Cooper's Eye on the Left: New York Times still trying to blame Sarah Palin

June 19th, 2017 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

In the wake of the shooting of U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise by a left-wing partisan last week, the New York Times resurrected (but eventually modified) a long discredited, 6-year-old accusation against former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as somehow being responsible for the shooting of former U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords in 2011.

Photo by Manuel Balce Ceneta

Fake news

Six years ago, left-wing media quickly leaped to the conclusion that comments by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin had somehow been responsible for the shooting of U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords, D-Ariz. It was ridiculous on its face, outrageous in its allegation and in time shooter Jared Lee Loughner, a partisan of left-, not ring-wing causes, was found to be mentally deranged, not politically motivated.

Somehow in the face of the shooting of U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., by a rabid supporter of Democratic causes on Wednesday, The New York Times brought back the allegation.

Justifying the newspaper editorial board's decision not to link last week's incident with ideology, the editorial nevertheless said there was a "clear link" from Palin's rhetoric to Giffords' shooting.

"In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear," the board wrote. "Before the shooting, Sarah Palin's political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs."

After the editorial was slammed by people of various political persuasions, including one description of "the worst editorial they have run in a decade, the Times issued a correction and made several online edits of the piece. It also included the words: "But in that case [involving Palin] no connection to the shooting was ever established."

 

Remember when ESPN was for sports?

Last week, its "First Take" co-host Max Kellerman said the NFL had injected "politics [into the game] by playing the national anthem putting pressure on you to stand for it."

In the same commentary, he defended Seattle Seahawks defensive lineman Michael Bennett's comparison of free agent quarterback Colin Kaepernick to the late boxer Muhammad Ali. Ali, of course, declined to defend the country during the Vietnam War on religious, moral and ethical principles and faced jail time. Kaepernick declined to stand for the national anthem as a protest for various injustices he believed were being visited on black Americans. He faced no fines, no jail time, only the scorn of many Americans.

Neither Ali and Kaepernick, Kellerman said, "went out looking for a protest."

It's true that neither may have been looking for a protest, but each made the decisions they made knowing full well what might happen if they did what they did.

Many are the reasons ESPN is hemorrhaging viewers, but for anyone to suggest that it becoming another MSNBC has nothing to do with it is ludicrous.

 

Whip or no whip with your intolerance?

A woman customer at a Starbucks near Charlotte, N.C., got her coffee last week, but she was served up a little derision with it since she was wearing a T-shirt supportive of President Donald Trump.

Kayla Hart said the cashier at the East Boulevard location in Dilworth laughed at her, and her order was labeled with a political message, mocking her support for the president.

"They shouted out 'build a wall,' and shoved a drink at me," she told Fox 46 TV, "and then all the baristas in the back started cracking up laughing."

When customers started staring, Hart said, she just walked out.

"I don't know what politics has to do with getting a cup of coffee," she said, describing herself as a loyal Starbucks customer.

Hart said she immediately emailed the corporate coffee server's customer service department. The news station asked what response she was given.

"We failed to meet this customer's expectations of us," the statement read, "and we have apologized and are working directly with her to make it right. The experience is not consistent with our standards or the welcoming and respectful experience we aim to provide every customer who visits our stores."

The statement also said the store partners would be "using this as a coaching opportunity for the future."

Hart said she also heard from the company and is determining whether she will return.

"This isn't me trying to get people to stop going to Starbucks," she said. I just want it to be put out there so people know this is what's occurring."

 

Evergreen is ever blue

It's just one college, but it's emblematic of higher education across the country. For the past two decades, employees of Evergreen State College of Olympia, Wash., have given Democrats $10 in donations for every dollar given to Republicans.

Going back to the 1996 election cycle, Evergreen employees have given just over $50,000 to Democrats and just under $5,000 to Republicans, according to data collected by the Center for Responsive Politics.

In the 2016 campaign, employees gave $10,086 to Democrats and $400 to Republicans, all of which went to the presidential campaign of Ben Carson.

Statistics also show college employees gave $16,741 to Democrats in 2008 (when Barack Obama was elected president) and $200 to Republicans, which represents 1.18 percent of all giving. Indeed, Evergreen employees have not given a single dollar to a Republican congressional candidate since 2012.

The upshot, of course, is the donations often are reflected in what's taught in the school, which is hardly a reflection of the electorate.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com