Historical parallels often spring to mind when it comes to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
In the brutality and megalomania of Vladimir Putin, many are reminded of Adolf Hitler. In the soaring rhetoric and heroic defiance of Volodymyr Zelenskyy, others hear echoes of Winston Churchill. In the moral outrage but relatively cautious policies of Joe Biden, there is a touch of George - Wouldn't Be Prudent - H.W. Bush.
And in Wednesday's decision by the Boston Athletic Association to prohibit runners from Russia and Belarus from competing in the Boston Marathon this month, we recall the words of Otter, one of the frat house characters from "National Lampoon's Animal House": "I think this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part."
The president of the BAA explained in a news release that "we believe that running is a global sport, and as such, we must do what we can to show our support to the people of Ukraine." In an email, the association told me that a total of 63 athletes will be removed from the marathon and a 5-kilometer race that precedes it.
Superficially, the decision is of a piece with other recent cancellations of Russian performers: the removal of Valery Gergiev as chief conductor of the Munich Philharmonic for refusing to denounce the invasion of Ukraine; the nixing of the planned summer performances at London's Royal Opera House of the Bolshoi Ballet, which has long been an arm of the Russian state; the Met's cancellation of soprano Anna Netrebko for her past association with Putin (though she subsequently did issue a statement denouncing the war).
One can debate the merits of these decisions. If we are going to ban Russian artists and athletes for the invasion of Ukraine, why shouldn't other countries do the same thing to American musicians and athletes the next time an American president deploys forces to some place where they hadn't been invited?
On Wednesday, I asked the BAA what responsibility the banned athletes have for the policies of their government. No reply. I also asked whether exceptions would be made for runners who made public statements denouncing the invasion of Ukraine. No reply on this, either.
The questions must be difficult to answer because it is hard to think of any justification for the BAA's indiscriminate discrimination. So let's help them think this one through.
First point: Thousands of Russians have, in recent weeks, courageously risked imprisonment by publicly protesting the war. Clearly, not all Russians and Belarusians support their leaders - a point the BAA should seek to honor, not ignore.
Second point: To reduce citizens of a state to an identity with the politics of their government is not just a gross moral simplification. It is also a gift to people like Putin, who want nothing more than to have people believing that they alone speak for all their people. It should be possible for Russians and Belarusians to be both proud of their countries and ashamed of their governments.
Third point: In recent years, Putin has gone out of his way to castigate Woke Western culture for being censorious and repressive, not to mention hypocritical. What the BAA has done only validates the allegation.
In "Animal House," Otter defends his fellow Deltas by insisting, "You can't hold a whole fraternity responsible for the behavior of a few sick, perverted individuals." On this point, at least, let's give Otter his due: You also don't hold entire societies responsible for the behavior of their despotic leaders. The BAA should think this one over and let the Russians and Belarusians compete under their countries' flags for the hope of what their countries might someday become, free from the yoke of their present leaders.
The New York Times