Cooper: 'There goes the neighborhood'

Cooper: 'There goes the neighborhood'

April 30th, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

A New York Times article, which ran in the Times Free Press Sunday, was headlined "Mostly black community becoming whiter."

It might, instead, have been titled "Life is happening."

The story behind the headline was that in a progressive Southern capitol city — Raleigh, North Carolina — white residents were moving into neighborhoods that previously were inhabited by all-black residents.

"Here, and in the center of cities across the United States, a kind of demographic change has been accelerating," the story read. "White residents are increasingly moving into nonwhite neighborhoods, largely African American ones."

We're not sure if The New York Times doesn't get out much, or pays much attention to life beyond the liberal Northeast, but this movement of people has been going on in Chattanooga for three decades or more and likely as long in most other cities between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.

The story pointed out correctly that between 1980 and 2000, more than 98% of the change in census tract diversity came about because of blacks moving into previously all-white neighborhoods.

Fifteen to 20 years before that, many black families did not have that opportunity because it was forbidden by law or because they were redlined by banks. Many also couldn't afford to leave where they were, be it in public housing or in a tiny house — often rented — in a compact, poor neighborhood.

When laws changed and banks subsequently relaxed their policies, blacks who could afford to do so began to move to the suburbs. When that happened, white flight opened even more room there.

But within a few years of the majority of white flight, at least in Chattanooga and likely in most cities, reverse white flight, or "white return," The New York Times story called it, began to occur.

In Chattanooga, it started slowly in Highland Park, St. Elmo and North Chattanooga, neighborhoods that began as white suburbs but gradually became thoroughly mixed as the city's downtown streets were rolled up at 5 p.m.

But younger generations didn't want a city that slept during the evening, so thought, energy and money were spent to transform downtown into an alive and thriving place.

Even as that began, some white Chattanoogans saw the possibilities and were attracted by the short drives downtown from the adjoining neighborhoods, by the smaller real estate prices and by living in a more diverse neighborhood, and started to renovate houses in the mixed suburbs.

In the 19 years since the era the Times story referred to, when the diversity was largely black-to-white neighborhoods, that trend has only continued.

In Chattanooga, for instance, it picked up in the Southside and East Main Street neighborhoods, where short hops downtown and access to nightlife enticed more whites to move to formerly all-black enclaves.

Similarly, the Times story anecdotally refers to white Raleigh residents who "wanted to be in downtown," didn't want a "neighborhood where all the kids look exactly the same as my kids" and wanted to buy in an affordable neighborhood where if they didn't, "somebody else was definitely going to buy that home."

It would be naive to pretend, though, that the negative aspects of gentrification didn't happen in Chattanooga, or probably in Raleigh, or in any city where the trend is occurring.

In situations where often white landowners see an opportunity for a better return on their investment than in collecting several hundred dollars in monthly rental on a tumbledown house, they simply end the rental agreement, and sell the property to a developer who puts a new house on it, or they develop it themselves. The renters, often black, are forced to find another home, sometimes hurriedly and probably not nearly as cheaply as they were paying before.

No laws are broken, no land owners should be faulted for wanting to capitalize on their holdings, the neighborhood is improved and the county gets more in taxes on the property. Win, win, win, win.

The only one who didn't win is the former renter, who either couldn't or didn't buy the property, or move, if they had an opportunity earlier. And, often old or infirm or both, their plight even might get worse and the chance to improve their situation is gone with the wind.

The answer for future generations, of course, is to value education, to obtain a degree, certified skill or trade, and to own the place where you live. If you have those, you have choices.

We hope in time a saga on whites moving into formerly black neighborhoods won't be viewed as a story — just life. And wouldn't it be even better if that also meant in every neighborhood there was no need to talk about quality of schools, racial tension, gang violence and, as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, "the most segregated hour of Christian America [being] 11 o'clock on a Sunday morning."

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com


Loading...