Cooper: More hypocrisy on border fixes

Cooper: More hypocrisy on border fixes

August 23rd, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

Immigrants line up in the dining hall in July at the U.S. government's newest holding center for migrant children in Carrizo Springs, Texas. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)

Photo by Associated Press /Times Free Press.

If the issue weren't so serious, the politics of the left on illegal immigration could make one laugh aloud.

The latest came Wednesday after the Trump administration gave the left what it has been begging for — the ability to keep illegal immigrant parents and children together, despite rules that predated the administration that said they should be separated.

OK, the administration said, we'll keep them together. That'll speed up hearings about their improper presence in the U.S. — or their asylum claims (of which fewer than one-fifth were granted during a 10-city pilot program over the past year) — and quicken their potential deportation should their hearing not go their way.

Democrats, only since Trump has been in office, have taken exception to separating illegal immigrant children from families, as has been the law. It's cruel, it's inhumane, it's wrong, they said.

But a Bill Clinton-era court agreement, the 1997 Flores settlement, laid out how illegal immigrant children were to be treated while in custody. And a Barack Obama-era court ruling in 2015 said children could only be held for 20 days, which is nowhere near quick enough for hearings to be held for their parents, who are among thousands of illegal immigrants awaiting hearings.

So what frequently happened was the Department of Homeland Security had to process the families and let them go, whereupon they would disappear into the U.S. and never return for their status hearing (often called "catch and release"). The court ruling was one of the keys to the resurgent flood of immigrants, who now could use their children — and ones they claimed as their children — as pawns for their release into the U.S.

Once the Trump administration announced the policy to change the Flores rules (but keep its protections), though, Democrats stood naked in their hypocrisy when they immediately opposed it.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said the administration "is seeking to codify child abuse, plain and simple." U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, said the policy was "punishing vulnerable families."

You see, Democrats never cared about the children being together with their parents. They just wanted them all released — into the U.S., far from the border, on their way to becoming dependents the party could use to its advantage.

Now, individuals, faith-based organizations and social service agencies who have decried the separation of children from parents at the border should get behind the administration's new regulation, or become complicit in the hypocrisy that surrounds the issue.

The regulation, upon posting, will take effect in 60 days if not struck down by a court.

"The new rule will protect children by reducing incentives for adults, including human smugglers, to exploit minors in the dangerous journey to our border," Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Kevin McAleenan said.

It also would establish family residential facilities with dining, medical and educational centers that he described as "campus-like." Imagine, a humanitarian solution — or stopgap — to a very vexing problem.

Unlike Democrats, the administration is trying to do something about the situation. In fiscal 2019, since October, 475,000 family units have tried to enter the country, more than three times as many as in any previous full year in just 10 months.

McAleenan, in explaining the new regulation, described a recent conversation with a Guatamalan father who "basically said everybody knows that bringing a child is a passport for migration and release into the U.S."

That's what the 2015 court ruling did. It began with 68,000 family units in fiscal 2014, but once the word was out the flood was unstoppable.

"With the Flores fix today," said Ken Cuccinelli, acting director of the Citizenship and Immigration Services, "something Congress should have done a long time ago, we're looking forward to seeing less and less family units coming across the border."

If Democrats had any interest in solving the immigration crisis, short of the open borders so many of them want, they would embrace the administration's policy as a starting point. They would then seek to work together with President Donald Trump and Republicans to see what could be accomplished about young illegal immigrants already here, all illegal immigrants in the U.S., and those who seek to come today and in the future.

Decrying the very policy they said they wanted, and refusing to work on any type of compromise legislation, only shows them to be demagogues and does not give the American people any confidence in their ability to share leadership of the country.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315