Cooper's Eye on the Left: Beto's blithering border burbling

Cooper's Eye on the Left: Beto's blithering border burbling

June 24th, 2019 by Clint Cooper in Opinion Free Press

Former Democratic Texas congressman Beto O'Rourke needed to be asked three times in an interview recently whether illegal border crossings ought to be illegal. His eventual answer was a non-answer.

Photo by Contributed Photo /Times Free Press.

Not ready for prime time

Although he could boast of recent backing from ancient country singer Willie Nelson, former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke of Texas had trouble answering a straightforward question by CNN host Jake Tapper recently. He asked if O'Rourke believed it should be a crime to illegally cross into the United States from Mexico.

Although it will come as a shock to many on the left, it is crime to do so.

Tapper, basing his question off a proposal by former San Antonio, Texas, Mayor Julian Castro that border crossings should be decriminalized and treated as civil offenses, asked if the current law in which the crossings are illegal should be repealed.

On the third ask, O'Rourke finally burbled a non-answer: "I don't know if it should be repealed but we should acknowledge that most of those arriving at the border now, especially from Central America, are at the most desperate and vulnerable moment and they pose no threat or harm to this country."

Coincidentally, two U.S. agencies, Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, recently conducted an investigation on two caravans from Central American bound for the U.S.

Among their numbers, according to the findings, were hundreds with criminal histories, including murder, aggravated assault and sexual offenses previously committed in the U.S.

No threat or harm? Sorry, Beto, no one's buying that one.

 

Just makin' stuff up

Poor Joe. It's sad that former Vice President Joe Biden, leading in early 2020 polls for the Democratic presidential nomination, is the subject of assaults from the nearly two dozen other candidates. But now he's resorting to funny math in order to make his points.

Last week, he told the Poor People's Campaign presidential forum that "almost half the people in the United States [are] living in poverty."

Even the far left Washington Post didn't let that one go by, giving him "three Pinocchios" (a "significant factual error") for what it said was a claim that is "flat-out wrong."

The official poverty measure puts the number at 12.3%, and the supplemental poverty measure puts it at 14%.

But, wait, said the Biden campaign, he meant every individual or family with an income below 200% of the poverty level, which would put the number at 43.3% of the 2017 U.S. population. For comparison's sake, 200% of the poverty level for a family of four in 2019 is $51,500.

"Biden is flat-out wrong to claim half the country is living in poverty," The Post Fact Checker wrote. "The three independent experts we surveyed, all of them leaders in the field of poverty research, did not hesitate to criticize his math and rejected the notion that all people below 200 percent of the poverty line should be counted as poor."

 

Here's a thought

While a U.S. House hearing on slavery reparations was covered by news agencies last week, most of them didn't include the testimony of former National Football League star Burgess Owens, or if they did, they just mentioned that he testified at the hearing.

Why? Because the black former Super Bowl champion didn't toe the line.

Oh, Owens thought reparations were due the descendants of slavery, but he thought the political party that wanted slavery to continue, the party of the Ku Klux Klan, the party of Jim Crow laws, the party of abortion ought to pay the reparations. That party, of course, is the Democratic Party.

"I used to be a Democrat," he said, "until I did my history and found out the misery that that party brought to my race ... Let's pay restitution. How about the Democratic Party pay for all the misery brought to my race "

To date, no Democrat has stepped up and given Owens a high-five and said he was right with him.

 

Here's your gun control

Being a good little Democratic state, Maryland followed the party playbook and banned "high capacity" magazines and a variety of "assault weapons," and required would-be handgun buyers to submit fingerprints to state police in registering their guns through its Firearm Safety Act of 2013.

Per Democrats, that should lower handgun crimes and virtually end any shooting with assault weapons. Well, Baltimore, the state's largest city and run by Democrats for 68 of the last 72 years, didn't play along.

Recently, the Baltimore Sun reported that shootings in the city were on track to surpass 2018 figures, and those were up nearly 80 percent from 2014.

Getting Started/Comments Policy

Getting started

  1. 1. If you frequently comment on news websites then you may already have a Disqus account. If so, click the "Login" button at the top right of the comment widget and choose whether you'd rather log in with Facebook, Twitter, Google, or a Disqus account.
  2. 2. If you've forgotten your password, Disqus will email you a link that will allow you to create a new one. Easy!
  3. 3. If you're not a member yet, Disqus will go ahead and register you. It's seamless and takes about 10 seconds.
  4. 4. To register, either go through the login process or just click in the box that says "join the discussion," type your comment, and either choose a social media platform to log you in or create a Disqus account with your email address.
  5. 5. If you use Twitter, Facebook or Google to log in, you will need to stay logged into that platform in order to comment. If you create a Disqus account instead, you'll need to remember your Disqus password. Either way, you can change your display name if you'd rather not show off your real name.
  6. 6. Don't be a huge jerk or do anything illegal, and you'll be fine.

Chattanooga Times Free Press Comments Policy

The Chattanooga Times Free Press web sites include interactive areas in which users can express opinions and share ideas and information. We cannot and do not monitor all of the material submitted to the website. Additionally, we do not control, and are not responsible for, content submitted by users. By using the web sites, you may be exposed to content that you may find offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must evaluate, and bear all risks associated with, the use of the Times Free Press web sites and any content on the Times Free Press web sites, including, but not limited to, whether you should rely on such content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you acknowledge that we shall have the right (but not the obligation) to review any content that you have submitted to the Times Free Press, and to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content that we determine, in our sole discretion, (a) does not comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement; (b) might violate any law, infringe upon the rights of third parties, or subject us to liability for any reason; or (c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill. Moreover, we reserve the right to reject, delete, disable, or remove any content at any time, for the reasons set forth above, for any other reason, or for no reason. If you believe that any content on any of the Times Free Press websites infringes upon any copyrights that you own, please contact us pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (Title 17 U.S.C. § 512) at the following address:

Copyright Agent
The Chattanooga Times Free Press
400 East 11th Street
Chattanooga, TN 37403
Phone: 423-757-6315
Email: webeditor@timesfreepress.com