Legislation designed to stop the potential release of climate-controlling chemicals into the atmosphere is scheduled to be considered in the House this week, a bill the Senate's sponsor also relates to chemtrails, a conspiracy theory related to the lines of vapor coming from jet planes.
One environmental lobbyist called the measure "nonsense," even though it passed the Senate last week 25-6.
Rep. Monty Fritts, R-Kingston, is taking the matter seriously and is slated to put House Bill 2063 before the Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday. He is not expected to try to amend the measure.
Fritts said Monday the bill deals only with "geoengineering" purportedly to be done by the federal government and noted he is not concerned about a connection with chemtrail conspiracy theories.
The bill claims the federal government and other entities acting at the government's request are preparing to conduct experiments by dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere. It further notes the impact on human health and the environment from this type of "broad scale geoengineering" isn't fully understood.
Chemtrail conspiracy theories have surfaced for decades. But the bill could be a reaction to a measure signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022 instructing the Office of Science and Technology Policy to work with NASA on research of climate intervention.
An article in MIT Technology Review reported the crux of the federal plan is to release tiny particles into the atmosphere that, theoretically, could reflect enough sunlight to slow down the Earth's warming. In other instances, groups could try to determine whether the release of particles might stop cirrus clouds from trapping heat against the Earth, according to a news report.
The bill, which would avert that in Tennessee, says "intentional injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus within the borders of this state into the atmosphere with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight is prohibited."
Sen. Steve Southerland, a Morristown Republican who initiated the legislation, didn't mention chemtrails when he passed the bill on the Senate floor last week.
But when he spoke to the Tennessee Lookout previously, he made that part of his argument, pointing out that a space shuttle doesn't leave a chemtrail. Likewise, he said, emissions at Watts Bar nuclear and Kingston fossil plants appear to be "pure steam," in contrast to the chemtrails from some jets.
"If you look at a thousand planes, you won't see one (chemtrail). But then all of a sudden you see one," Sutherland said. "So we're just asking the question: Are they putting anything in the air that could be toxic?"
Scott Banbury, a lobbyist with the Sierra Club, described the bill as more of a laughing matter than anything and said efforts in the legislature to undo wetlands protections are more important.
"It's not happening. It's not gonna happen anytime soon," Banbury said, adding he was uncertain how the bill got so much traction in committees. "It's nonsense."
Numerous websites debunk the theories surrounding chemtrails.
David Keith's Research Group with Harvard University describes chemtrails as a conspiracy theory that governments and other groups are running a secret program to add visible plumes containing toxic chemicals to the atmosphere, similar to contrails or vapor trails released by aircraft engine exhaust that are made up mainly of water in the form of ice crystals.
The group notes, "We have not seen any credible evidence that chemtrails exist," but if researchers did find proof the government is endangering people it would be "eager to expose and stop any such activities."
Banbury pointed out fear of chemtrails has been discussed for years, but he was uncertain how the federal government could conspire with enough people to send out toxic chemicals from jets without someone "blowing the whistle."
Read more at TennesseeLookout.com.